I just finally figured out why my card import was showing me strange results, Revised cards don't have the same collector numbers here than on scryfall...
https://deckbox.org/editions/21-revised-edition
Swamp here are:
- 299
- 300
- 301
And on Scryfall they are https://scryfall.com/search?q=swamp+set%3A3ed+unique%3Aprints&order=name&as=checklist&unique=cards
- 298
- 299
- 300
I've looked around and I can't quite find the authoritative source for collector ids for these old sets, but that's certainly a discrepancy I figured was worth pointing out.
What happens in my case is that my CSV import has the card numbers looked up from Scryfall, and when importing on deckbox, I guess Swamp/Revised/298 doesn't exist, so the system fall-backs to just Swamp/Revised and merges up these cards with the closest match.
I imagine that for most cards, this discrepancy gets transparently solved by the name fallback, but in the case of basic lands, it does behave strangely.
Thanks for an awesome site!
https://deckbox.org/editions/21-revised-edition
Swamp here are:
- 299
- 300
- 301
And on Scryfall they are https://scryfall.com/search?q=swamp+set%3A3ed+unique%3Aprints&order=name&as=checklist&unique=cards
- 298
- 299
- 300
I've looked around and I can't quite find the authoritative source for collector ids for these old sets, but that's certainly a discrepancy I figured was worth pointing out.
What happens in my case is that my CSV import has the card numbers looked up from Scryfall, and when importing on deckbox, I guess Swamp/Revised/298 doesn't exist, so the system fall-backs to just Swamp/Revised and merges up these cards with the closest match.
I imagine that for most cards, this discrepancy gets transparently solved by the name fallback, but in the case of basic lands, it does behave strangely.
Thanks for an awesome site!